Original Article
02/13/2014
By Len Besthoff
They have every right to be there in Connecticut once they have served their sentences. But some voting districts have raised concerns.
A state elections panel is investigating an incident that raises questions about the fine line between personal rights and public safety. _____ says he was so intimidated this past fall, that the Norwalk man left his polling place without exercising his right to vote…all because of his criminal past. He spoke with NBC Troubleshooters’ Chief Investigative Reporter Len Besthoff.
“I feel like they violated my rights, my voting rights.” You can sense the anger in _____’s voice as he describes what happened last September during a Democratic primary vote in Norwalk. “I felt intimidated. I felt like I was being stuck out, it was very humiliating, very embarrassing”
_____ is a registered sex offender. He was released from prison a decade ago, after serving five years for a sexual assault conviction involving a woman he knew. He turned down an offer to have the case dropped and charges erased after 13 months. He chose to go to trial.. and lost.
_____ says since prison, he started his own business, works with troubled teens…and has actively voted, until last fall…that’s when he says he was turned away at his polling station, the Columbus Elementary School in Norwalk...which was holding classes that day. “They said I would have to leave the grounds of the school immediately. I asked them why. They didn’t want to answer it. They called an officer over who escorted me off the school property.”
The registrar’s office sent _____ back to the polls, telling him he had the right to vote.
“_____: That’s when the officer shadowed me…it was shadowing, meaning real close. And it made anyone who was watching think that I was a danger to someone else. Besthoff: How close was he standing? _____: Real close. Besthoff: Like a foot? _____: Not even a foot. Less than that.”
_____ left Columbus Elementary without voting. “I was discouraged. I think that was the first time I hadn’t voted in the last 10 years”. So why did this happen to _____? Norwalk Democratic Registrar Stuart Wells asked police for printouts of all registered sex offenders in town that might be voting in the primary…and distributed them to poll moderators. “The schools had all expressed a considerable interest in increasing their security since Sandy Hook, for obvious reasons. We have…10 locations that are schools that we use for polling places.”
Problem was, no distinction was made between registered sex offenders like _____, whose conviction involved an adult, and others who may have had crimes involving children. “When we checked with his probation officer he said he had no restrictions on being near schools”
- If the person committed a crime against an adult or child what does it matter? Aren't people there while he votes? What's the big deal? This is nothing but pure hysteria!
The poll moderator and police have a different version of what happened with _____. Neither will comment. The case file is sealed while it remains under investigation. The bigger question, is how to deal in the future with registered sex offenders, who, unlike _____, do have offenses involving children, when the polling stations are at schools? And according to the Secretary of the State’s office, roughly one third of all Connecticut public schools are open on Election Day.
People convicted of crimes involving children often are forbidden from going near schools. The state says those convicts are often subject to lengthy terms of supervision after their sentences, and arrangements can be made to allow them to vote at a school that is open…but Stuart Wells isn’t so sure.
“Besthoff: You don’t have a playbook for how to deal with this stuff! Wells: Correct, if there are, if they couldn’t go in the schools, and you don’t qualify for an absentee ballot, how’s the person supposed to exercise their constitutional right to vote? We’re concerned about that. We don’t want to impact the children, but we want everybody vote who’s entitled to do so, without getting arrested in the process.”
- Then stop holding voting in schools!
The state legislature is expected to deal with this issue…but not until next year. First a constitutional amendment must pass this fall allowing lawmakers to fine tune Connecticut’s election laws. In the meantime, Larry _____ just hopes his next vote at Columbus Elementary goes smoother.
“There’s a lot of votes on the street. A lot of votes. But if they see what’s happening, that happened to me, then people aren’t gonna want to show up.”
There is a possibility this could be dealt with sooner rather than later, with at least a temporary fix. A state elections panel is expected to discuss the issue soon, and we will let you know what progress it makes.
Showing posts with label Voting. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Voting. Show all posts
Thursday, February 13, 2014
Tuesday, February 11, 2014
DC - Eric Holder makes case for felons to get voting rights back
Original Article
02/11/2014
By Adam Goldman
(Full Speech) Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. on Tuesday called on states to repeal laws that prohibit ex-felons from voting after their release from prison, urging reforms that could allow millions more former convicts across the country to cast ballots.
In a speech at Georgetown University Law Center, Holder said: “It is time to fundamentally reconsider laws that permanently disenfranchise people who are no longer under federal or state supervision.”
Holder said that current laws forbidding felons from voting make it harder for them to reintegrate into society. He pointed to a recent study, which showed that felons in Florida who were granted the right to vote again had a lower recidivism rate.
“These restrictions are not only unnecessary and unjust, they are also counterproductive,” Holder said. “By perpetuating the stigma and isolation imposed on formerly incarcerated individuals, these laws increase the likelihood they will commit future crimes.”
Holder does not have the authority to force states to change their laws, but his request could influence the debate to restore voting rights. His appeal is part of a broader effort currently underway by the Justice Department to reform the criminal justice system, which U.S. officials say often treats minority groups unfairly.
The attorney general said that after the Civil War, laws that prohibit ex-felons from voting were a way for post-Reconstruction states to keep blacks from casting ballots. Today, an estimated 5.8 million Americans are not allowed to vote because of current or previous felony convictions. Of those, nearly 38 percent are black.
The Justice Department said that 23 states since 1997 have enacted voting-rights reforms. They include Nebraska, Nevada, Texas and Washington state.
In Virginia, former governor Robert F. McDonnell enacted a policy last year that allowed those with non-violent felony convictions to have their voting rights automatically restored. But critics say the effort still leaves many disenfranchised.
Virginia is one of four states where voting rights are not restored automatically when felons are released from prison.
The Justice Department said that 11 states, including Florida and Kentucky, restrict voting rights for ex-felons. Holder said that 10 percent of Florida’s population is disenfranchised.
Voting-rights activists are trying to change the law in that state to make it easier for “returning citizens” to vote. The push could become a campaign issue in Florida’s gubernatorial election this year.
In Kentucky, a bill to restore felon voting rights to those not convicted of certain lascivious or violent crimes gained momentum last month in the state legislature.
“These laws deserve to be not only reconsidered, but repealed,” Holder said.
According to a 2002 academic study on voter disenfranchisement, former vice president Al Gore might have prevailed in the 2000 presidential election had ex-felons been allowed to vote nationwide.
02/11/2014
By Adam Goldman
(Full Speech) Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. on Tuesday called on states to repeal laws that prohibit ex-felons from voting after their release from prison, urging reforms that could allow millions more former convicts across the country to cast ballots.
In a speech at Georgetown University Law Center, Holder said: “It is time to fundamentally reconsider laws that permanently disenfranchise people who are no longer under federal or state supervision.”
Holder said that current laws forbidding felons from voting make it harder for them to reintegrate into society. He pointed to a recent study, which showed that felons in Florida who were granted the right to vote again had a lower recidivism rate.
“These restrictions are not only unnecessary and unjust, they are also counterproductive,” Holder said. “By perpetuating the stigma and isolation imposed on formerly incarcerated individuals, these laws increase the likelihood they will commit future crimes.”
Holder does not have the authority to force states to change their laws, but his request could influence the debate to restore voting rights. His appeal is part of a broader effort currently underway by the Justice Department to reform the criminal justice system, which U.S. officials say often treats minority groups unfairly.
The attorney general said that after the Civil War, laws that prohibit ex-felons from voting were a way for post-Reconstruction states to keep blacks from casting ballots. Today, an estimated 5.8 million Americans are not allowed to vote because of current or previous felony convictions. Of those, nearly 38 percent are black.
The Justice Department said that 23 states since 1997 have enacted voting-rights reforms. They include Nebraska, Nevada, Texas and Washington state.
In Virginia, former governor Robert F. McDonnell enacted a policy last year that allowed those with non-violent felony convictions to have their voting rights automatically restored. But critics say the effort still leaves many disenfranchised.
Virginia is one of four states where voting rights are not restored automatically when felons are released from prison.
The Justice Department said that 11 states, including Florida and Kentucky, restrict voting rights for ex-felons. Holder said that 10 percent of Florida’s population is disenfranchised.
Voting-rights activists are trying to change the law in that state to make it easier for “returning citizens” to vote. The push could become a campaign issue in Florida’s gubernatorial election this year.
In Kentucky, a bill to restore felon voting rights to those not convicted of certain lascivious or violent crimes gained momentum last month in the state legislature.
“These laws deserve to be not only reconsidered, but repealed,” Holder said.
According to a 2002 academic study on voter disenfranchisement, former vice president Al Gore might have prevailed in the 2000 presidential election had ex-felons been allowed to vote nationwide.
Labels:
Voting,
WashingtonDC
Location:
Washington, DC, USA
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

